What just happened in Hong Kong should
not leave us indifferent, and deserves better than short
rehashes of the most police-friendly article of the South China Morning Post or anxiety-conjuring front-page
pictures of rioters (no demonstrators there…) being “appropriately”
contained by duty-blissed (and heavily-equipped) constables. First, because even
though it happened in the early hours of the second day of the fiery fire
monkey year, “squabble day” (Chek Hau)
actually falls on the third day, so, clearly, the whole episode marks more than the calendar! Second, because even pro-Beijing
legislator Regina Ip—the one who, as secretary for security,
failed to sell article 23 to Hong Kong people back in 2002-2003—views it as somehow
reflecting the inability of the Hong Kong government to tackle the deep-rooted
issues affecting the SAR. And finally, because these events hold
a universal message that not even our neon-glowing out-of-this-world
gaming paradise should ignore.
Scenes of street-battle in Mong Kok
happening at a time of supposedly festive and rejuvenating mood helped capture our imagination, and added to the sense of “disproportionate” incongruity between the trigger—the expulsion of
illegal street hawkers by police-backed agents of the Food and Environmental
Hygiene Department around Langham Place—and images of intense clashes between
policemen and demonstrators, possibly not seen since the 1960s. Soon
characterized as “riots”, as to delegitimize the whole affair (and probably
frustrate some insurance claims!), what had started as a “quarrel” between the
hawkers and officials grew into fierce opposition to state authority
after a so-called “localist” group, Hong Kong Indigenous, encouraged
people through social media to come and support the hawkers. Violence erupted:
cobblestones were dislodged from the pavement and thrown at the police;
chubby orange-colored rubbish bins set on fire; windows and surveillance
cameras broken; police sticks heavily fell on necks, backs and shoulders; warning shots were fired; blood was spilled and participants as well as
policemen injured; journalists
were threatened by both sides and arrests were made—dozens of them. Yet, at
the height of the confrontation, no
more than 300 people participated!
All that sound and fury for a “fish ball
revolution” of 300? And if violence is to be utterly condemned and
responsibilities have yet to be fully established what is this protest in aid of?
In an enlightened op-ed, Jason
Y. Ng makes a direct connection between these events and the Jasmine
Revolution—I immediately thought of the 228 in Taiwan
back in 1947—with the warning that one should “never underestimate what the
little guy can do.” For Ng, who equates the hawkers with Mohamed Bouazizi in
Tunisia, such dramatic events can only happen because of short- as well as
long-terms dysfunctions of the Hong Kong government, with the little people—booksellers
included!—feeling more and more like helpless victims, in a wider context of
broken promises—social, economical and political. Beyond the almost exclusive
blame put on C.Y. Leung “dismantling the city bit by bit”, Ng’s final comments
sound like a resounding warning: “Unless we find a way to cool the rising
political temperature, it is perhaps a matter of time before we have our very
own Mohamed Bouazizi and protesters set more than just garbage on fire.”
A
study released in mid-January by The University of Hong Kong actually showed
that the Public
Sentiment Index had hit a 20-year low, even lower than in 2003 at the time
of the combined SARS and Article 23 crises, or at the end of 2014 during the
Umbrella Movement. The Index is precisely meant to
quantify Hong Kong people’s sentiments “in order to explain and predict the
likelihood of collective behaviour”!
What about Macao then? Is there a “localist” movement? Is civil society mature enough to escape the grip of traditional associations? Is the government perceived as doing the right job and is it fully trusted? One would be hard-pressed to find a hint of scientifically grounded survey regarding any of these issues… let alone anticipate them!
What about Macao then? Is there a “localist” movement? Is civil society mature enough to escape the grip of traditional associations? Is the government perceived as doing the right job and is it fully trusted? One would be hard-pressed to find a hint of scientifically grounded survey regarding any of these issues… let alone anticipate them!
Published in Macau Daily Times on February 12th 2016
No comments:
Post a Comment